You are currently viewing New Name of PMO: Now Seva Teerth’

New Name of PMO: Now Seva Teerth’

Share with friends
  • The Government of India has taken a historic and symbolic decision by renaming the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) as “Seva Teerth.”
  • This move is seen not merely as a name change, but as an attempt to shift the core spirit of governance from “power to service.”

Why Was the Name Changed? — Purpose and Vision

  • According to the government, this change marks a cultural transformation in administrative thinking.
  • The new name “Seva Teerth” reinforces the idea that the PMO is not just a center of authority but a sacred space dedicated to public service.
  • The government says this step distances institutions from old “colonial symbolism” and redefines them toward public welfare, service, and people-centric governance.

New Structure — What Will Change?

  • The Prime Minister’s Office will be shifted to a new, modern campus named “Seva Teerth-1.”
  • This campus will include advanced administrative facilities and a reformed structural setup.
  • As part of this process, the names of several important government residences and offices across the country are also being changed —
    • For example, the Governor’s official residence, earlier called ‘Raj Bhavan,’ will now be renamed ‘Lok Bhavan.’

Background — Not the First Time

This change is part of a broader pattern witnessed in recent years:

  • Rajpath was renamed Kartavya Path.
  • The official residence of the Prime Minister was renamed Lok Kalyan Marg.
  • Now, PMO and several other administrative buildings are being renamed to shift the public perception from symbols of power to symbols of duty and service.

Key Discussion Points — For Your Readers

  • Will this change remain limited to names, or will it bring real transformation in administrative functioning and public accountability?
  • How effective will the message of “power to service” be, and will it influence public perception?
  • Will such naming reforms strengthen institutional trust and connection, or will they remain symbolic gestures?